Home / News

Beware the Trojan Horse: Government’s New Financial Advisers a Step Backwards


In a recent announcement, the Albanese government unveiled its plan to revolutionize financial advice accessibility for Australians, introducing a new class of advisers labeled “qualified advisers.” 

Getting advice from a “qualified adviser” sounds like a good thing, but a closer inspection reveals a major red flag.  This new class of financial advisers will be required to have fewer qualifications than current professionals. 

One major concern is that these new advisers, lacking the same rigorous education standards as traditional financial advisers, may inadvertently become glorified salespeople for superannuation funds. This move seems to overlook the hard lessons learned from the Royal Commission, potentially exposing Australians to the very conflicts of interest and predatory practices that led to widespread financial harm.

The use of the term “qualified advisers” is misleading at best and disingenuous at worst. True financial advisers are held to high educational standards to ensure they possess the knowledge and skills necessary to provide sound advice. The proposed class of advisers may lack the comprehensive training needed, raising questions about their ability to deliver quality advice and leaving Australians vulnerable to subpar financial guidance.

Furthermore, the reforms open the door to potential conflicts of interest by allowing superannuation funds and product providers to play a more active role in the advice process. This shift raises concerns about the independence of advice provided under the new model. If super funds are given the latitude to influence advice in their favor, it is imperative that such conflicts be transparently disclosed to consumers.

We must not forget the hard-won lessons from the Royal Commission, where widespread misconduct and unethical practices were laid bare. The proposed changes risk eroding the progress made in rebuilding trust within the financial advice industry. Instead of fostering a robust and trustworthy advice environment, these reforms risk reverting to the days when financial advice was tainted by self-interest and malpractice.

Chris Young

Christopher Young